https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61118
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Assignee|unassigned at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61118
--- Comment #23 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Note that if we fix the abnormal handler to target the block after the setjmp
rather than the setjmp itself all the problems magically disappear. That's
actually a more accurate CFG and arguably the right
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61118
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|DUPLICATE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61118
--- Comment #21 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
No problem Eric. I'm monitoring on behalf of Florian who'd really like to see
this fixed for gcc-8.
Actually just noticed it still wasn't showing up in the queries. It didn't
have a target milestone set
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61118
--- Comment #20 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #19)
> Note you lost the regression marker when this was made a duplicate of 21161.
> So it's unlikely anyone would have looked at it until the next release cycle.
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61118
--- Comment #19 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Note you lost the regression marker when this was made a duplicate of 21161.
So it's unlikely anyone would have looked at it until the next release cycle.
My understanding from Florian is that at least so
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61118
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61118
Yury Gribov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ygribov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #17
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61118
--- Comment #16 from Joseph S. Myers ---
I think the -Wclobbered warning probably needs to be reimplemented on GIMPLE,
in a way that actually looks at whether it's possible for a variable to be set
after the returns-twice call and before the vari
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61118
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61118
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61118
--- Comment #14 from Paul Eggert ---
Also please see related reports Bug 21161, Bug 48968, Bug 54561, Bug 65041, and
Bug 83162. The last-listed one also is a regression, perhaps induced by the
fancier optimization in recent GCC versions. I suspec
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61118
Florian Weimer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[6/7/8 Regression] Spurious |[6/7/8 Regression] Indirect
13 matches
Mail list logo