[Bug middle-end/61158] negative shift at fold-const.c:12095

2021-02-20 Thread zeccav at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61158 Vittorio Zecca changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/61158] negative shift at fold-const.c:12095

2014-09-06 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61158 John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||danglin at

[Bug middle-end/61158] negative shift at fold-const.c:12095

2014-09-06 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61158 --- Comment #9 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org --- It looks like the test fails because HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT is 32 on hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11. As a result, the fold optimization doesn't occur.

[Bug middle-end/61158] negative shift at fold-const.c:12095

2014-05-15 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61158 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jakub Date: Thu May 15 10:01:11 2014 New Revision: 210467 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210467root=gccview=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/61158 * fold-const.c

[Bug middle-end/61158] negative shift at fold-const.c:12095

2014-05-15 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61158 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jakub Date: Thu May 15 10:08:12 2014 New Revision: 210469 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210469root=gccview=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/61158 * fold-const.c

[Bug middle-end/61158] negative shift at fold-const.c:12095

2014-05-15 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61158 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Fixed for 4.9.1+ so far.

[Bug middle-end/61158] negative shift at fold-const.c:12095

2014-05-14 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61158 --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Vittorio Zecca from comment #2) I found this one with -fsanitize=shift. The runtime error message says shift exponent -8 is negative. Maybe this is also a sanitizer

[Bug middle-end/61158] negative shift at fold-const.c:12095

2014-05-14 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61158 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last

[Bug middle-end/61158] negative shift at fold-const.c:12095

2014-05-13 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61158 Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at

[Bug middle-end/61158] negative shift at fold-const.c:12095

2014-05-13 Thread zeccav at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61158 --- Comment #2 from Vittorio Zecca zeccav at gmail dot com --- I found this one with -fsanitize=shift. The runtime error message says shift exponent -8 is negative. Maybe this is also a sanitizer bug?