[Bug middle-end/63186] [4.9/5 Regression] Undefined .L* symbols because of fnsplit

2014-09-19 Thread dan at danny dot cz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63186 --- Comment #5 from Dan HorĂ¡k dan at danny dot cz --- Jan, can you backport the fix also to 4.9? It is causing a problem in Fedora where at least one build is failing due this problem.

[Bug middle-end/63186] [4.9/5 Regression] Undefined .L* symbols because of fnsplit

2014-09-19 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63186 --- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Yes, this patch should apply to 4.9 as well.

[Bug middle-end/63186] [4.9/5 Regression] Undefined .L* symbols because of fnsplit

2014-09-11 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63186 --- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: hubicka Date: Thu Sep 11 06:46:23 2014 New Revision: 215149 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215149root=gccview=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/63186 * ipa-split.c

[Bug middle-end/63186] [4.9/5 Regression] Undefined .L* symbols because of fnsplit

2014-09-08 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63186 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.9.2

[Bug middle-end/63186] [4.9/5 Regression] Undefined .L* symbols because of fnsplit

2014-09-07 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63186 Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last

[Bug middle-end/63186] [4.9/5 Regression] Undefined .L* symbols because of fnsplit

2014-09-07 Thread andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63186 Andi Kleen andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||andi-gcc at

[Bug middle-end/63186] [4.9/5 Regression] Undefined .L* symbols because of fnsplit

2014-09-05 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63186 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- For the case when any of the bbs considered for being split (into function.part.N) refers to a label which is defined in one of the basic blocks that are not considered for split we