https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64809
--- Comment #10 from ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ienkovich
Date: Thu Jan 29 12:20:55 2015
New Revision: 220241
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220241root=gccview=rev
Log:
gcc/testsuite/
PR middle-end/64809
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64809
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64809
--- Comment #8 from ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ienkovich
Date: Wed Jan 28 11:46:44 2015
New Revision: 220205
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220205root=gccview=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR middle-end/64809
* cfgexpand.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64809
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64809
--- Comment #4 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Please note that the testcase is nondeterministic. That is also the reason
why it is hard to reduce. You may need to run gcc several times to hit the bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64809
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64809
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 34590
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34590action=edit
gcc5-pr64809.patch
IMHO in any case we should apply something like the attached patch,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64809
Yuri Rumyantsev ysrumyan at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ysrumyan at
