https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65082
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65082
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
See bug 43491 comment #12 for some analysis of this issue really.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65082
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65082
--- Comment #4 from NickParker at Eaton dot com ---
That was with 's' optimisation, and it does the sames for optimisation level
'1'.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65082
--- Comment #3 from NickParker at Eaton dot com ---
register uint16_t r4 asm (r4);
register uint16_t r6 asm (r6);
volatile int8_t localOscCosine;
volatile int8_t acInput;
void pllExec(void)
{
int16_t mix_output_s2=0;
r4 += r6;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65082
Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|AVR-GCC |avr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65082
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Related to bug 44281 and bug 42596.
