https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66148
Thomas Preud'homme thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66148
--- Comment #5 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2015-05-25, at 3:21 AM, thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
Here the REG_EQUAL does not match the value that is set: the 32 most
significant bits are zero. Which is why combine decide that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66148
John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||thopre01
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66148
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66148
--- Comment #2 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 35559
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35559action=edit
Preprocessed source
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66148
--- Comment #1 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Introduced in r223034:
2015-05-12 Thomas Preud'homme thomas.preudho...@arm.com
* combine.c i(set_nonzero_bits_and_sign_copies): Split code updating
