https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66820
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jul 10 10:26:19 2015
New Revision: 225661
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225661root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/66820
* gimplify.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66820
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jul 10 14:14:18 2015
New Revision: 225678
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225678root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/66820
* gimplify.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66820
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66820
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
So, the problem is that the fold_stmt folding added in that revision creates
new decls that it doesn't put into the current gimplification context vars, but
instead creates whole
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66820
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Note, this is unrelated to PR66633, that one even after the fix is a bug
somewhere in tree-nested.c.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66820
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I guess related to PR66633.
