https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66984
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** Bug 46679 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66984
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66984
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66984
--- Comment #7 from Gary Funck gary at intrepid dot com ---
Don't know what the criteria is for closing bugs, but as far as I'm concerned,
this bug can be marked resolved and the other two referenced PR's marked as
duplicates of this one.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66984
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66984
--- Comment #2 from Jay jay.krell at cornell dot edu ---
1 please be sure that dividing the most negative number by -1 works.
Perhaps just don't optimize anything with negstive numbers.
2 I suggest that gcc's C/C++ frontends expose these other
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66984
--- Comment #4 from Gary Funck gary at intrepid dot com ---
(In reply to Jay from comment #2)
1 please be sure that dividing the most negative number by -1 works.
Perhaps just don't optimize anything with negstive numbers.
- Checking for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66984
--- Comment #6 from gfunck at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: gfunck
Date: Fri Jul 24 16:10:39 2015
New Revision: 226168
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226168root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-07-24 Gary Funck g...@intrepid.com
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66984
--- Comment #5 from Gary Funck gary at intrepid dot com ---
(In reply to Jay from comment #2)
2 I suggest that gcc's C/C++ frontends expose these other forms of division,
for the sake of testability.
Perhaps defining a builtin for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66984
--- Comment #3 from Gary Funck gary at intrepid dot com ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
The usual fix in fold-const.c is to make sure to convert operands to the
required type when building the final expression. Thus instead of
10 matches
Mail list logo
