[Bug middle-end/68870] [6 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O1, -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

2015-12-16 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68870 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/68870] [6 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O1, -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

2015-12-16 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68870 --- Comment #10 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Dec 16 14:56:10 2015 New Revision: 231695 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231695&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-12-16 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/68870

[Bug middle-end/68870] [6 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O1, -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

2015-12-16 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68870 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug middle-end/68870] [6 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O1, -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

2015-12-15 Thread asolokha at gmx dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68870 --- Comment #8 from Arseny Solokha --- I believe the following reproducer is for the issue reported here. Its further minimization yields backtrace listed in #c0. The only difference is that w/ the following not minimized snippet gcc ICEs in tre

[Bug middle-end/68870] [6 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O1, -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

2015-12-14 Thread rguenther at suse dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68870 --- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On December 15, 2015 3:15:13 AM GMT+01:00, law at redhat dot com wrote: >https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68870 > >--- Comment #6 from Jeffrey A. Law --- >I'd say that changing genmat

[Bug middle-end/68870] [6 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O1, -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

2015-12-14 Thread law at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68870 --- Comment #6 from Jeffrey A. Law --- I'd say that changing genmatch (or any code) to know about the freelist is a horrid hack and just papering over the problem. I haven't put this case under a debugger, but presumably we've got a reference to

[Bug middle-end/68870] [6 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O1, -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

2015-12-14 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68870 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Or change genmatch so that it stops looking if it sees SSA_NAMEs in free list.

[Bug middle-end/68870] [6 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O1, -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

2015-12-14 Thread law at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68870 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at redhat dot com --- Comment #4 fr

[Bug middle-end/68870] [6 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O1, -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

2015-12-14 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68870 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- The right (TM) fix: Index: gcc/tree-cfgcleanup.c === --- gcc/tree-cfgcleanup.c (revision 231617) +++ gcc/tree-cfgcleanup.c (workin

[Bug middle-end/68870] [6 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O1, -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

2015-12-14 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68870 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug middle-end/68870] [6 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O1, -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

2015-12-12 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68870 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|