[Bug middle-end/69008] gcc emits unneeded memory access when passing trivial structs by value (ARM)

2021-05-04 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69008 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug middle-end/69008] gcc emits unneeded memory access when passing trivial structs by value (ARM)

2020-06-04 Thread pb at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69008 Philip Blundell changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pb at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #8

[Bug middle-end/69008] gcc emits unneeded memory access when passing trivial structs by value (ARM)

2020-03-21 Thread david.forgeas at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69008 David Forgeas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||david.forgeas at gmail dot com ---

[Bug middle-end/69008] gcc emits unneeded memory access when passing trivial structs by value (ARM)

2017-03-14 Thread rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69008 --- Comment #6 from Richard Earnshaw --- (In reply to Marc Mutz from comment #5) > Why is this only "missed-optimization"? Don't these architecture's ABIs > stipulate passing in registers, as well as the Itanium ABI? So why is this > not a

[Bug middle-end/69008] gcc emits unneeded memory access when passing trivial structs by value (ARM)

2017-03-09 Thread marc.mutz at kdab dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69008 Marc Mutz changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marc.mutz at kdab dot com --- Comment #5

[Bug middle-end/69008] gcc emits unneeded memory access when passing trivial structs by value (ARM)

2016-08-04 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69008 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|rtl-optimization|middle-end --- Comment #4 from Andrew