[Bug middle-end/72747] powerpc: wrong code generated for vec_splats in cascading assignment

2016-11-17 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72747 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||npmccallum at redhat dot com --- C

[Bug middle-end/72747] powerpc: wrong code generated for vec_splats in cascading assignment

2016-11-02 Thread willschm at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72747 Will Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/72747] powerpc: wrong code generated for vec_splats in cascading assignment

2016-11-02 Thread willschm at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72747 --- Comment #4 from Will Schmidt --- Author: willschm Date: Wed Nov 2 14:13:07 2016 New Revision: 241793 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241793&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [gcc] 2016-11-02 Will Schmidt Backport from trunk 20

[Bug middle-end/72747] powerpc: wrong code generated for vec_splats in cascading assignment

2016-11-02 Thread willschm at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72747 --- Comment #3 from Will Schmidt --- Author: willschm Date: Wed Nov 2 14:12:23 2016 New Revision: 241792 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241792&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [gcc] 2016-11-02 Will Schmidt Backport from trunk 20

[Bug middle-end/72747] powerpc: wrong code generated for vec_splats in cascading assignment

2016-10-28 Thread willschm at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72747 --- Comment #2 from Will Schmidt --- Author: willschm Date: Fri Oct 28 13:28:46 2016 New Revision: 241647 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241647&root=gcc&view=rev Log: gcc: 2016-10-26 Will Schmidt PR middle-end/72747 * gi

[Bug middle-end/72747] powerpc: wrong code generated for vec_splats in cascading assignment

2016-10-26 Thread wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72747 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Component|target |middle-end --- Comment #1 from Bill Schmi