[Bug middle-end/76174] Missed VRP optimization

2022-01-11 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=76174 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.0

[Bug middle-end/76174] Missed VRP optimization

2022-01-11 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=76174 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:45ddb395187f8f5f278880fe1422d8958ac35da6 commit r12-6513-g45ddb395187f8f5f278880fe1422d8958ac35da6 Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug middle-end/76174] Missed VRP optimization

2022-01-11 Thread amacleod at redhat dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=76174 Andrew Macleod changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug middle-end/76174] Missed VRP optimization

2021-08-19 Thread amacleod at redhat dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=76174 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Macleod --- I would argue that this isn't a range issue. Looking at the code generated without the c *= 2 I see: : goto ; [INV] : if (q_1 == r_6(D)) goto ; [INV] else goto ; [INV] : m ();

[Bug middle-end/76174] Missed VRP optimization

2021-08-18 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=76174 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2016-08-13 00:00:00 |2021-8-18 --- Comment #3 from Andrew

[Bug middle-end/76174] Missed VRP optimization

2016-08-15 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=76174 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org