https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87209
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||10.2.0, 9.2.0
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87209
--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor ---
(As suggested in bug 87315) besides issuing a warning it would be safer to do
what Clang does in cases like this and either replace the code with a trap, or
simply eliminate the access (and the malloc call)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87209
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87209
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||alias, missed-optimization