[Bug middle-end/97027] missing warning on buffer overflow storing a larger scalar into a smaller array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97027 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/97027] missing warning on buffer overflow storing a larger scalar into a smaller array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97027 --- Comment #10 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f0500db3692276f60e0562c17c87a0cb03e34398 commit r12-2338-gf0500db3692276f60e0562c17c87a0cb03e34398 Author: Martin Sebor Date:

[Bug middle-end/97027] missing warning on buffer overflow storing a larger scalar into a smaller array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97027 Christophe Lyon changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug middle-end/97027] missing warning on buffer overflow storing a larger scalar into a smaller array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97027 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|ASSIGNED

[Bug middle-end/97027] missing warning on buffer overflow storing a larger scalar into a smaller array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97027 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #8 from Martin Sebor

[Bug middle-end/97027] missing warning on buffer overflow storing a larger scalar into a smaller array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97027 --- Comment #7 from Martin Sebor --- Something like the patch in comment 3 to handle the overflow in tree-ssa-strlen.c is still needed. Otherwise GCC does issue a -Warray-bounds but that's enabled only with -Wall (the test expects buffer

[Bug middle-end/97027] missing warning on buffer overflow storing a larger scalar into a smaller array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97027 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug middle-end/97027] missing warning on buffer overflow storing a larger scalar into a smaller array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97027 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/97027] missing warning on buffer overflow storing a larger scalar into a smaller array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97027 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a110855667782dac7b674d3e328b253b3b3c919b commit r12-2132-ga110855667782dac7b674d3e328b253b3b3c919b Author: Martin Sebor Date: Wed

[Bug middle-end/97027] missing warning on buffer overflow storing a larger scalar into a smaller array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97027 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |msebor at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug middle-end/97027] missing warning on buffer overflow storing a larger scalar into a smaller array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97027 --- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor --- Another test case. Of the buffer overflow in the four functions in it, only a subset is diagnosed. The subset depends on the form of the assignment in the IL which in turn changes from target to target.

[Bug middle-end/97027] missing warning on buffer overflow storing a larger scalar into a smaller array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97027 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|