https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99578
--- Comment #43 from Yann Droneaud ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #37)
> Fixed on the trunk so far, temporarily by differentiating between < 4KB
> addresses which are still handled like GCC 11 did for warning purposes, and
> >= 4KB
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99578
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yann at droneaud dot fr
--- Comment #42
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99578
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99578
--- Comment #40 from Martin Liška ---
Can we close it as it was backported to gcc-11, Jakub?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99578
--- Comment #39 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:91f7d7e1bb6827bf8e0b7ba7eb949953a5b1bd18
commit r11-9731-g91f7d7e1bb6827bf8e0b7ba7eb949953a5b1bd18
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99578
--- Comment #38 from Goswin von Brederlow ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #34)
> (In reply to Goswin von Brederlow from comment #29)
> > There is no garantee in the C standard that '(type *)CONSTANT' will actually
> > point to the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99578
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11/12 Regression] gcc-11 |[11 Regression] gcc-11
