http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56044
mrs at gcc dot gnu.org mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56044
--- Comment #8 from Dimitris Papavasiliou dpapavas at gmail dot com ---
Is there anything more I can do to help with this? Does the process simply
take a lot of time or is there no interest in such a feature?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56044
--- Comment #9 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot
com ---
After sending a patch to gcc-patches, please keep pinging weekly on
gcc-patches with the ObjC maintainers CC:ed, and giving the URL of the
original patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56044
--- Comment #10 from Dimitris Papavasiliou dpapavas at gmail dot com ---
I see, thanks for the advice. Just a clarification: you mean that I should CC
the personal email of the two objc maintainers as I find it from the page
below, correct?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56044
--- Comment #11 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot
com ---
On Wed, 5 Feb 2014, dpapavas at gmail dot com wrote:
I see, thanks for the advice. Just a clarification: you mean that I should CC
the personal email of
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56044
--- Comment #6 from Dimitris Papavasiliou dpapavas at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 30417
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30417action=edit
Proposed patch adding switches controlling ivar scope in Objective-C.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56044
--- Comment #7 from Dimitris Papavasiliou dpapavas at gmail dot com ---
I made a patch for this (as well as some other minor features) and submitted it
to the gcc-patches list but, since it was ignored there I'm also attaching it
here in case
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56044
--- Comment #5 from Dimitris Papavasiliou dpapavas at gmail dot com
2013-01-20 11:09:57 UTC ---
Actually trying out -Wno-shadow indicates that it doesn't make any difference
in this case. The compiler keeps complaining about the instance
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56044
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-19
20:07:30 UTC ---
Did you try -Wshadow ?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56044
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56044
--- Comment #3 from Dimitris Papavasiliou dpapavas at gmail dot com
2013-01-19 22:27:30 UTC ---
Created attachment 29224
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29224
Testcase
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56044
--- Comment #4 from Dimitris Papavasiliou dpapavas at gmail dot com
2013-01-19 22:29:10 UTC ---
I have considered -Wshadow and this is the way I think I'll go for now because
thinking up of variable names is hard enough without having to
12 matches
Mail list logo