--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2005-01-31 19:30
---
In general, you have to make sure that you have the required versions
of other packages. As for helping you to sort out hardware problems --
please look elsewhere on the web, this forum here is concerned with
--- Additional Comments From sitaram dot banda at gmail dot com 2005-01-31
19:01 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> I think it is time to check your memory and/or hardware, this works for so
many other people.
Yeah, can you help me insorting out the issue. I am providing some of the info
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-31
18:20 ---
I think it is time to check your memory and/or hardware, this works for so many
other people.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From sitaram dot banda at gmail dot com 2005-01-31
17:23 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> gcc 3.2.x was definitely not stable on opteron. As far as I remember,
> opteron support was developed by SuSE on the hammer branch and by
> redhat on top of their 3.2.x based
--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2005-01-31 14:02
---
gcc 3.2.x was definitely not stable on opteron. As far as I remember,
opteron support was developed by SuSE on the hammer branch and by
redhat on top of their 3.2.x based compiler. I believe that both folded
--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-31
13:40 ---
> Is this still a problem for you with more recent releases of GCC? I don't
> think
> anyone is still interested in providing patches for GCC 3.2.
Moreover I'm not sure the FSF 3.2.x compiler is really r
--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-31
13:30 ---
Is this still a problem for you with more recent releases of GCC? I don't think
anyone is still interested in providing patches for GCC 3.2.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19722
