--- Comment #24 from lucier at math dot purdue dot edu 2006-07-19 00:19
---
Well, I just hit the same bug in 4.1.1, so it survived from 4.1.0.
I must be one hell of an atypical guy building 4.1.1, my bootstrap on x86-64
RHEL 4.0 didn't work (PR 28066), my 32-bit bootstrap on
On Jul 19, 2006, at 9:19 AM, lucier at math dot purdue dot edu wrote:
I must be one hell of an atypical guy building 4.1.1, my bootstrap
on x86-64
RHEL 4.0 didn't work (PR 28066),
Well PR 28066 is not a GCC bug but a bug in an older pre-release of
binutils.
-- Pinski
--- Comment #25 from pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2006-07-19 00:27
---
Subject: Re: All error messages produce segfault
On Jul 19, 2006, at 9:19 AM, lucier at math dot purdue dot edu wrote:
I must be one hell of an atypical guy building 4.1.1, my bootstrap
on x86-64
RHEL
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23541
--- Comment #19 from ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-31 13:51 ---
Of the 3 workarounds in comment #17, bootstrap with Sun cc doesn't work because
of PR 18058 (although there is a patch posted for that PR). Also bootstrap
with GCC 2.x or 3.x isn't quite right since I tried 3.4.x
--- Comment #20 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-31 14:09
---
Of the 3 workarounds in comment #17, bootstrap with Sun cc doesn't work
because of PR 18058 (although there is a patch posted for that PR). Also
bootstrap with GCC 2.x or 3.x isn't quite right since I tried
--- Comment #21 from ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-31 14:29 ---
(In reply to comment #20)
It's the wrong PR, this one is for pre-4.2, the 3 workarounds work.
The problem is minor for pre-4.2. The blocker PR for 4.2 is PR other/26507.
Huh? The third comment in 26507 (by you I
--- Comment #22 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-31 14:36
---
Huh? The third comment in 26507 (by you I might add) agrees that PR 26507 and
this one are the same problem. We should close one as a dup of the other.
I precisely chose not to close either because of their
--- Comment #23 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-31 14:44
---
My hope is that this PR will get more attention. We can't IMHO release 4.2
with this problem still there, and it was filed in October.
Oh, and feel free to take a stab at it. :-) Part of the problem is that
--- Comment #18 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-08 18:10
---
Created an attachment (id=10993)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10993action=view)
Naive fix.
It tweaks 4 (really 3) C source files and is sufficient to overcome the
problem.
But it's
--- Comment #17 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-09 08:57
---
Bootstrapping with 'gcc -std=c89' hasn't worked.
Here are 3 workarounds:
- configure with --disable-nls,
- bootstrap with Sun cc,
- bootstrap with GCC 2.x or GCC 3.x.
--
--- Comment #11 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-04 09:15
---
*** Bug 25602 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #12 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-04 09:16
---
*** Bug 25200 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #13 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-04 09:56
---
OK, all this mess comes from the following lines in /usr/include/locale.h:
#if (__STDC__ - 0 == 0 \
!defined(_XOPEN_SOURCE) !defined(_POSIX_C_SOURCE)) || \
defined(__EXTENSIONS__)
#include
--- Comment #14 from alex at milivojevic dot org 2006-01-04 15:03 ---
Benjamin:
You are not alone. I hit that bug too ;-)
Andrew:
I can reproduce the bug on my system. I haven't done anything fancy. And I
made sure only standard Solaris header files/libraries were visible while
--- Comment #15 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-04 16:01
---
Hmmm... If in dgettext.c I simply change the order the files are included,
would that solve the problem? Or the fix is going to be more complex?
Both in dgettext.c and dngettext.c at a minimum as far as I
--- Comment #16 from alex at milivojevic dot org 2006-01-04 19:55 ---
(In reply to comment #15)
Both in dgettext.c and dngettext.c at a minimum as far as I can see. Another
possible path is to bootstrap the compiler with Sun cc or with gcc -std=c89.
Bootstrapping with 'gcc -std=c89'
--- Comment #9 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-15 16:39
---
*** Bug 24039 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #10 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-15 16:40
---
Investigating.
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-30
09:38 ---
Could you post the exact configure line and command line you used to build the
compiler? And the output of 'gcc -v' for the bootstrap compiler?
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From fgccbz0 at greynode dot net 2005-08-29 13:36
---
It sounds like you have a mismatching header installed and nothing more.
Such a difference is certainly possible - thank's for the e-mail address. That
ought to provide the hook I need to continue.
--
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-26
17:20 ---
Eric Botcazou is sparc maintainer:
sparc port Eric Botcazou [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It sounds like you have a mismatching header installed and nothing more.
--
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-25
13:35 ---
4.1.0 works just fine:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-08/msg00241.html
So does 4.0.2:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-08/msg00182.html
So it has to be your configuration is different
--- Additional Comments From fgccbz0 at greynode dot net 2005-08-25 13:30
---
(In reply to comment #1)
This sounds like a bug in your configuration as nobody else I know of has had
this problem.
Are you sure these unnamed other people are using not just 64-bit targeted but
64-bit
--- Additional Comments From fgccbz0 at greynode dot net 2005-08-25 14:09
---
(In reply to comment #3)
4.1.0 works just fine:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-08/msg00241.html
So does 4.0.2:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-08/msg00182.html
Thanks.
So it has
--- Additional Comments From fgccbz0 at greynode dot net 2005-08-25 21:46
---
I'm not really sure how to proceed here. I've told you a symptom, a diagnosis
describing a probable flaw in the code, and possible solution. You've pointed me
at some logs from a person I don't know with an
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-24
11:37 ---
This sounds like a bug in your configuration as nobody else I know of has had
this problem.
--
What|Removed |Added
27 matches
Mail list logo
