--- Comment #2 from jg at jguk dot org 2006-11-30 15:52 ---
Hi,
What the issue is that distros split up GCC into different packages which
means
it is an installation issue but not a GCC issue.
Good point.
I still think the text can be improved; how about like this:
gcc:
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-30 18:20 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Hi,
What the issue is that distros split up GCC into different packages which
means
it is an installation issue but not a GCC issue.
Good point.
I still think the text can be
--- Comment #4 from jg at jguk dot org 2006-12-01 00:00 ---
Hi, Thanks for your reply.
We look into acouple of directories to find jc1, so it is not hardcoded
directly. The --prefix directory is hardcoded into gcc but that is just one
directory where we look into, we also search
--- Comment #4 from jg at jguk dot org 2006-12-01 00:00 ---
Hi, Thanks for your reply.
Again if the distros did not split up the compiler, you would not have an
installation
problem but a notice that the Java compiler is not installed so I don't think
this
should be fixed or
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2006-12-01 00:05
---
Subject: Re: Clarify gcc jc1 cc1 cc1plus installation problem No such file or
directory error
--- Comment #4 from jg at jguk dot org 2006-12-01 00:00 ---
Hi, Thanks for your reply.
Again if the
--- Comment #6 from jg at jguk dot org 2006-12-01 02:03 ---
Hi Pinski,
What do you think about it mentioning No such file or directory ?
I presume if someone had built GCC them self with Java not enabled it would
give the same gcc: installation problem, cannot exec 'jc1': message? If
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-17 19:55 ---
gcc: installation problem, cannot exec 'jc1': Check GNU Java Compiler 'gcj' is
installed.
Except this is not really a GCC issue because when java is not enabled, you get
an error about java not being installed.
