--- Comment #6 from rich at phekda dot gotadsl dot co dot uk 2007-01-06
14:54 ---
I've repeated my testing with binutils 070103 (from snapshot from web page) and
gcc 4.3.0 20070104 from svn trunk (svn revision 120449).
Using hidden visibility with the attribute before the function
--
rich at phekda dot gotadsl dot co dot uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|minor |normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30361
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-03 21:43 ---
Note that the attribute is attached to the return type of the function f,
not
the function declaration itself. I think this means that the hidden visibility
is applied to the type, not the function, which is
--- Comment #2 from rich at phekda dot gotadsl dot co dot uk 2007-01-03
21:45 ---
Created an attachment (id=12853)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12853action=view)
A test case
When I compile the attached test case, I get:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] test-cases]$ make
g++ -W
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-03 21:45 ---
Read:
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.1.1/gcc/Attribute-Syntax.html
Which describes the syntax.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30361
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-03 21:46 ---
gcc (GCC) 4.1.1 20061011 (Red Hat 4.1.1-30)
This should also tell you, that you are using a modified version of the
compiler and the bug report should have been filed up with redhat first.
--
--- Comment #5 from rich at phekda dot gotadsl dot co dot uk 2007-01-03
21:55 ---
Thanks for the quick response and the reference to the attribute documentation.
I agree my comment about the documentation being incorrect is wrong. But it
doesn't look to me like the visibility is
