--- Comment #4 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-20 23:23 ---
Is this a valid bug? Really, you should split the bug into components so the
respective maintainers can know about their corresponding warnings. Not
everybody reads all PRs.
--
manu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
--- Comment #3 from hjl at lucon dot org 2007-07-30 20:22 ---
*** Bug 32932 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
hjl at lucon dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-27 19:37 ---
the libobjc/exception.c ones are filed as PR30731.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32105
--- Comment #2 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2007-05-27 20:06 ---
Earlier discussion about soft-fp warnings went like this:
I noticed that there are no prototypes in soft-fp directory, and some
warnings
during the compilation are generated due to this fact. Do you see the same
