http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48378
--- Comment #6 from nbi at wideopenwest dot com 2011-04-02 21:16:47 UTC ---
I continue to get the originally reported error:
make[3]: Entering directory
`/usr/src/gcc-4.6-4.6.0.orig/gcc-4.6.0/host-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/gcc'
build/genhooks \
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48378
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-02
21:25:35 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
I continue to get the originally reported error:
It looks as though you continue to build in the source dir, but I can't know
for
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48378
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-02
21:26:28 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
Maybe there's something wrong with the packaging of the source?
It works for everyone else.
Actually maybe that's not true,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48378
--- Comment #9 from nbi at wideopenwest dot com 2011-04-02 22:24:00 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
(In reply to comment #6)
I continue to get the originally reported error:
It looks as though you continue to build in the source dir, but I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48378
--- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-02
22:52:32 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
(In reply to comment #7)
(In reply to comment #6)
I continue to get the originally reported error:
It looks as though you
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48378
--- Comment #11 from nbi at wideopenwest dot com 2011-04-02 23:18:08 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
(In reply to comment #9)
(In reply to comment #7)
(In reply to comment #6)
I continue to get the originally reported error:
It
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48378
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48378
--- Comment #13 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-02
23:32:10 UTC ---
The docs for --with-gmp also point out you might need to use LD_LIBRARY_PATH so
the gmp/mpfr/mpc libs will be found, which is the cause of the cannot compute
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48378
--- Comment #14 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-02
23:39:58 UTC ---
what my makefile does is put the gmp sources in the gcc tree as gcc-4.6.0/gmp
(not as gcc-4.6.0/gmp-5.0.1 as you seem to have it) and similarly for mpfr and
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48378
--- Comment #15 from nbi at wideopenwest dot com 2011-04-02 23:42:13 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #13)
The docs for --with-gmp also point out you might need to use LD_LIBRARY_PATH
so
the gmp/mpfr/mpc libs will be found, which is the cause of
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48378
--- Comment #16 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-02
23:44:47 UTC ---
you can tell it to use local copies of the files if you've already downloaded
them, look at the LOCAL_SRC variable
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48378
--- Comment #17 from nbi at wideopenwest dot com 2011-04-03 00:13:45 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #16)
you can tell it to use local copies of the files if you've already downloaded
them, look at the LOCAL_SRC variable
Thanks for your help.
Your
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48378
--- Comment #18 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-03
00:21:32 UTC ---
because x86_64 builds a multilib compiler by default, which is what most people
want.
use CONFIGARGS=--disable-multilib if you don't want that, or install
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48378
--- Comment #19 from nbi at wideopenwest dot com 2011-04-03 02:48:01 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #18)
because x86_64 builds a multilib compiler by default, which is what most
people
want.
use CONFIGARGS=--disable-multilib if you don't want
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48378
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-01
08:36:20 UTC ---
Building in a separate dir has the advantage you don't need to make clean, you
just remove the whole dir and start with an empty dir again.
I'm not sure 'make
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48378
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48378
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-31
10:38:30 UTC ---
this is documented at
http://gcc.gnu.org/install/configure.html
and
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/FAQ#configure
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48378
--- Comment #3 from nbi at wideopenwest dot com 2011-03-31 17:35:44 UTC ---
My apologies, I should know better to RTFM for something of GCC's complexity.
Have gotten too used to packages for which only in place configure make are
neccessary. Will
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48378
--- Comment #4 from nbi at wideopenwest dot com 2011-04-01 03:12:26 UTC ---
Followed the instructions for separate build directory. 'make' fails with the
same error as before! Yes, I did a 'make distclean' before 'make'.
19 matches
Mail list logo
