http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50925
--- Comment #19 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-27
20:42:39 UTC ---
Created attachment 26765
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26765
spill.c - another reduced test
Here is yet another different and
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50925
Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2011-11-04 00:00:00 |2012-02-17 0:00
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50925
--- Comment #18 from denisc at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-28 10:05:50 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #17)
Assuming there is a connexion between these two issues.
If that assumption turns out to be wrong, please cut the dependency.
Dependency
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50925
--- Comment #16 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-27
23:20:03 UTC ---
Created attachment 26486
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26486
main-loop.c (maybe related from PR52025)
This is a small test case from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50925
Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||52025
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50925
--- Comment #15 from denisc at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-14 18:11:33 UTC ---
Author: denisc
Date: Sat Jan 14 18:11:29 2012
New Revision: 183183
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=183183
Log:
PR target/50925
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50925
--- Comment #14 from denisc at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-12 18:30:00 UTC ---
Author: denisc
Date: Thu Jan 12 18:29:54 2012
New Revision: 183136
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=183136
Log:
PR target/50925
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50925
--- Comment #13 from denisc at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-06 18:42:23 UTC ---
Created attachment 26008
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26008
Simplified testcase
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50925
denisc at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||denisc at gcc dot gnu.org
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50925
--- Comment #10 from Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com 2011-12-05 18:53:34
UTC ---
Other ports seem to work OK when the requirement for a frame pointer is
conditional on the size of the stack. It's not the most common case, but it
does come
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50925
--- Comment #11 from denisc at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-05 19:08:41 UTC ---
Sorry, wrong button was pressed.
(In reply to comment #8)
I'm not going to be able to look at it anytime soon, but just some general
thoughts:
I think that I'm ready to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50925
--- Comment #12 from denisc at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-05 19:15:11 UTC ---
This is a very old bug:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42204
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2006-03/msg00783.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50925
--- Comment #8 from Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com 2011-11-14 17:09:04
UTC ---
I'm not going to be able to look at it anytime soon, but just some general
thoughts:
1. Disabling caller-saves probably isn't appropriate. Just looking at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50925
--- Comment #6 from Joel Sherrill joel at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-14 01:26:40
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
Asserting that the bug is not a flaw in avr backend, I set the component to
other. The bug is somewhere in the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50925
Joel Sherrill joel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50925
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50925
Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |other
Target
17 matches
Mail list logo
