[Bug other/53284] Several libatomic tests fail on 32-bit Solaris/x86

2012-05-10 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53284 --- Comment #4 from Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-10 09:11:14 UTC --- Author: ro Date: Thu May 10 09:11:05 2012 New Revision: 187366 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=187366 Log: Always compile atomic builtin tests

[Bug other/53284] Several libatomic tests fail on 32-bit Solaris/x86

2012-05-10 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53284 Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug other/53284] Several libatomic tests fail on 32-bit Solaris/x86

2012-05-10 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53284 --- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2012-05-10 12:17:17 UTC --- For the record, r187366 fixes the same failures on x86_64-apple-darwin10.

[Bug other/53284] Several libatomic tests fail on 32-bit Solaris/x86

2012-05-09 Thread ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53284 --- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-05-09 11:45:10 UTC --- --- Comment #1 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-08 22:39:35 UTC --- Can you investigate why configure

[Bug other/53284] Several libatomic tests fail on 32-bit Solaris/x86

2012-05-09 Thread rth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53284 Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug other/53284] Several libatomic tests fail on 32-bit Solaris/x86

2012-05-08 Thread rth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53284 --- Comment #1 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-08 22:39:35 UTC --- Can you investigate why configure decides that __atomic_compare_exchange_8 is implemented inline? That it isn't inline is obvious from the recursion. Was