http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55376
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55376
--- Comment #8 from Konstantin Serebryany konstantin.s.serebryany at gmail dot
com 2012-11-21 04:23:21 UTC ---
Why do you want to bother with a ChangeLog?
I don't.
I would prefer to simply mention the upstream revision to which was the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55376
--- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-19
22:58:17 UTC ---
I've got your point, but please understand mine: if the trees go too much out
of sync we (the asan team) will lose control over one of the copies
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55376
--- Comment #5 from Konstantin Serebryany konstantin.s.serebryany at gmail dot
com 2012-11-20 05:40:34 UTC ---
Merging in both directions is possible, but painful, so I'd prefer to limit it.
How about this phrasing?
===
All changes
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55376
--- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-20
07:23:26 UTC ---
===
All changes in this directory should be pre-approved by one of the
maintainers.
Trivial and urgent fixes (portability, build fixes, etc)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55376
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55376
--- Comment #3 from Konstantin Serebryany konstantin.s.serebryany at gmail dot
com 2012-11-18 18:47:19 UTC ---
Are all upstream changes considered reviewed and automatically approved for
gcc repo?
all upstream changes are pre- or
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55376
davidxl xinliangli at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xinliangli
