[Bug other/58996] [4.9 regression] build failure in libcilkrts

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58996 Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug other/58996] [4.9 regression] build failure in libcilkrts

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58996 --- Comment #18 from bviyer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: bviyer Date: Mon Jan 20 17:49:22 2014 New Revision: 206846 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206846root=gccview=rev Log: Fix for PR other/58996. +2014-01-20 Balaji V. Iyer

[Bug other/58996] [4.9 regression] build failure in libcilkrts

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58996 --- Comment #14 from Barry Tannenbaum barry.m.tannenbaum at intel dot com --- The original author of the code is no longer working on the Cilk project, so I can't say why it's using sched_getaffinity + gettid instead the pthread routine. But I'll

[Bug other/58996] [4.9 regression] build failure in libcilkrts

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58996 --- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- The reporter of PR57298 supposedly has or had, I don't.

[Bug other/58996] [4.9 regression] build failure in libcilkrts

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58996 --- Comment #16 from Balaji V. Iyer bviyer at gmail dot com --- Hi Jakub, Honestly, I don't know why the changes were done in aclocal.m4. I added the change to configure.ac and then did the following commands: autoreconf --force --verbose

[Bug other/58996] [4.9 regression] build failure in libcilkrts

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58996 --- Comment #17 from Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com --- If there's an interest, I could probably create a kickstart for a RHL8 VM suitable for building GCC 4.9. But it's a 10+ year old platform of marginal value at best. I'd be much more

[Bug other/58996] [4.9 regression] build failure in libcilkrts

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58996 --- Comment #9 from Balaji V. Iyer bviyer at gmail dot com --- Created attachment 31847 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31847action=edit Possible fix

[Bug other/58996] [4.9 regression] build failure in libcilkrts

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58996 --- Comment #10 from Balaji V. Iyer bviyer at gmail dot com --- Hi Paul and Jakub, I have attached a patch above (called Possible Fix). Does it work for you? Thanks, Balaji V. Iyer.

[Bug other/58996] [4.9 regression] build failure in libcilkrts

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58996 Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P1 |P4

[Bug other/58996] [4.9 regression] build failure in libcilkrts

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58996 --- Comment #12 from Paul H. Hargrove PHHargrove at lbl dot gov --- Balaji, Reading the patch it looks sufficient. I will test when I have a chance, but cannot guess how soon that may be, -Paul

[Bug other/58996] [4.9 regression] build failure in libcilkrts

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58996 --- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Why the aclocal.m4 removals? Also, while the rest of the HAVE_PTHREAD_AFFINITY_NP addition is one desirable step, I've said that it is not sufficient (but of course can be done

[Bug other/58996] [4.9 regression] build failure in libcilkrts

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58996 Barry Tannenbaum barry.m.tannenbaum at intel dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug other/58996] [4.9 regression] build failure in libcilkrts

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58996 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Not everything in glibc headers is meant for use by other packages, some symbols in there are just implementation details that can change any time. The affinity support is complicated,

[Bug other/58996] [4.9 regression] build failure in libcilkrts

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58996 --- Comment #8 from Paul H. Hargrove PHHargrove at lbl dot gov --- (In reply to Barry Tannenbaum from comment #6) I don't understand the reluctance to check the defintion of __cpu_set_t_defined, since it's defined right there in

[Bug other/58996] [4.9 regression] build failure in libcilkrts

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58996 Balaji V. Iyer bviyer at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bviyer at gmail

[Bug other/58996] [4.9 regression] build failure in libcilkrts

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58996 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot

[Bug other/58996] [4.9 regression] build failure in libcilkrts

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58996 --- Comment #4 from Balaji V. Iyer bviyer at gmail dot com --- Hi Jakub, __cpu_set_t_defined is defined in /usr/include/bits/sched.h in my SUSE machine and in Ubuntu machine. Thanks, Balaji V. Iyer.

[Bug other/58996] [4.9 regression] build failure in libcilkrts

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58996 --- Comment #5 from Paul H. Hargrove PHHargrove at lbl dot gov --- The patch in comment #2 allows the build to complete without the need to --disable-libcilkrts. However, I agree with Jakub (comment #3) that use of a glibc internal macros is a

[Bug other/58996] [4.9 regression] build failure in libcilkrts

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58996 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug other/58996] [4.9 regression] build failure in libcilkrts

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58996 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||build

[Bug other/58996] [4.9 regression] build failure in libcilkrts

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58996 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0