[Bug other/89394] libiberty :stack overflow in nm

2020-05-07 Thread trupti_pardeshi at persistent dot co.in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89394 --- Comment #11 from Trupti Pardeshi --- (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #10) > (In reply to Trupti Pardeshi from comment #9) > > May I know, in which version of binutils this fix is available? > > 2.35. Which should be available in

[Bug other/89394] libiberty :stack overflow in nm

2020-05-06 Thread nickc at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89394 --- Comment #10 from Nick Clifton --- (In reply to Trupti Pardeshi from comment #9) > May I know, in which version of binutils this fix is available? 2.35. Which should be available in August, all being well. Cheers Nick PS. The fix is

[Bug other/89394] libiberty :stack overflow in nm

2020-05-06 Thread trupti_pardeshi at persistent dot co.in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89394 Trupti Pardeshi changed: What|Removed |Added CC||trupti_pardeshi@persistent.

[Bug other/89394] libiberty :stack overflow in nm

2019-04-10 Thread nickc at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89394 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug other/89394] libiberty :stack overflow in nm

2019-04-10 Thread nickc at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89394 --- Comment #7 from Nick Clifton --- Author: nickc Date: Wed Apr 10 14:44:47 2019 New Revision: 270258 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270258=gcc=rev Log: Fix a stack exhaustion bug in libiberty's demangler when decoding a pathalogically

[Bug other/89394] libiberty :stack overflow in nm

2019-03-21 Thread nickc at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89394 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug other/89394] libiberty :stack overflow in nm

2019-03-04 Thread wcventure at 126 dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89394 --- Comment #5 from Cheng Wen --- So many similar cases and repetitive CVEs. This problem has been fixed before, but it has not been completely fixed. https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85122

[Bug other/89394] libiberty :stack overflow in nm

2019-03-04 Thread wcventure at 126 dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89394 Cheng Wen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wcventure at 126 dot com --- Comment #4

[Bug other/89394] libiberty :stack overflow in nm

2019-02-28 Thread spinpx at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89394 --- Comment #3 from spinpx --- CVE-2019-9071

[Bug other/89394] libiberty :stack overflow in nm

2019-02-19 Thread spinpx at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89394 --- Comment #2 from spinpx --- It can be reproduced in bintuils commit c72e75a64030b0f6535a80481f37968ad55c333a (Feb 19 2019)

[Bug other/89394] libiberty :stack overflow in nm

2019-02-18 Thread spinpx at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89394 --- Comment #1 from Peng Chen --- the code is from binutils: https://github.com/bminor/binutils-gdb/tree/master/libiberty git commit: 388a192d73df7439bf375d8b8042bb53a6be9c60