https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95316
bur...@net-b.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bur...@net-b.de
--- Comment #6 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95316
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.5|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95316
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.4|10.5
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95316
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.3|10.4
--- Comment #4 from Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95316
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.2|10.3
--- Comment #3 from Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95316
--- Comment #2 from Matthias Klose ---
I see it as a usage regression, because suddenly a developer using the nxptx
offloading gets an error message about an unrelated offload compiler that
didn't exist before.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95316
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED