https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31634
--- Comment #4 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke ---
31634 used to be relevant for ARC, but that port has since ceased to
support changing the name if TEXT_SECTION_ASM_OP etc. by command line
option, and uses now a string literal, precisely in order to
--- Comment #3 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-05 00:27 ---
The patch is here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-03/msg00243.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31634
--
amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
BugsThisDependsOn|39302 |
OtherBugsDependingO||39363
--- Comment #2 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-02 13:42 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Actually, struct unnamed_section is not suitable for garbage collected memory.
The data member is skipped, and the callback member points to a function,
which can change position when addres
--- Comment #1 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-19 19:27 ---
On second thought, the implementation is simpler when NULL is not treated
specially. But then there is a slight majority of the uses in the
config directory that wants the old behaviour of get_unnamed_section,
so it
