--- Comment #9 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-30 21:23 ---
It is not really a bug, but it is ugly.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39533
--- Comment #10 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-03-30 21:26
---
(In reply to comment #9)
It is not really a bug, but it is ugly.
Is there anything wrong with my patch?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39533
--- Comment #5 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-03-24 17:26 ---
Created an attachment (id=17536)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17536action=view)
A updated testcase
Here is the correct testcase.
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What
--- Comment #6 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-03-24 17:26 ---
A patch is posted at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-03/msg01133.html
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #8 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-24 17:49 ---
Why is this a bug? I'm really curious to know; the manual doesn't document
that -MM output is uniquified.
--
rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-23 21:39 ---
Example?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39533
--- Comment #2 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-03-23 21:44 ---
Created an attachment (id=17527)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17527action=view)
A testcase
# gcc -MM x.c -Iinclude
x.o: x.c foo.h include/ansidecl.h include/libiberty.h
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-24 01:48 ---
This testcase is not complete, it does not include foo.h.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-24 01:50 ---
If I do
cat foo.h EOF
#include ansidecl.h
EOF
I get the duplicated include file but I don;t think it matters as it is
included twice, how does the cpp know they are really the same include file
--
pinskia at
