https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81745
--- Comment #16 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #15)
> (In reply to Vincent Lefèvre from comment #14)
> > Even though GCC decides to add a newline to the logical file, so that the
> > missing diagnostic can be
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81745
--- Comment #15 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Vincent Lefèvre from comment #14)
> Even though GCC decides to add a newline to the logical file, so that the
> missing diagnostic can be regarded as correct, I think that an optional
> warning
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81745
--- Comment #14 from Vincent Lefèvre ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #13)
> GCC removed the pedwarning on purpose (between GCC 4.1 and 4.4), see PR
> 14331 and PR 68994.
No, PR 14331 was just asking to remove the warning by
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81745
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81745
--- Comment #12 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #11)
> C99 seems to explicitly say, within Clause J.2, in the second bullet point:
This seems to be in C23 still.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81745
--- Comment #11 from Sam James ---
C99 seems to explicitly say, within Clause J.2, in the second bullet point:
>
>1 The behavior is undefined in the following circumstances:
>
>[...]
>A nonempty source file does not end in a new-line
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81745
--- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Vincent Lefèvre from comment #9)
> Changed back to INVALID (there's a bug in bugzilla, which changes INVALID to
> FIXED after a reload + a new comment).
Sounds like something your browser
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81745
Vincent Lefèvre changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |INVALID
--- Comment #9 from Vincent
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81745
--- Comment #8 from Vincent Lefèvre ---
(In reply to Vincent Lefèvre from comment #7)
> Here one gets two different results!
For this latest issue (which is the cause of the error in C), I've reported
PR81746.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81745
--- Comment #7 from Vincent Lefèvre ---
And with only the preprocessor:
$ printf 'int main(void) { return 0; } \\' | gcc -E -
# 1 ""
# 1 ""
# 1 ""
# 31 ""
# 1 "/usr/include/stdc-predef.h" 1 3 4
# 32 "" 2
# 1 ""
int main(void) { return 0; } \
$
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81745
--- Comment #6 from Vincent Lefèvre ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #5)
> Also see http://www.opengroup.org/austin/aardvark/latest/xcubug2.txt
> ERN 76
This is not about the missing newline at the end of a file.
Moreover, GCC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81745
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
Also see http://www.opengroup.org/austin/aardvark/latest/xcubug2.txt
ERN 76
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81745
Vincent Lefèvre changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |FIXED
--- Comment #4 from Vincent
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81745
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81745
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
IIRC There was some discussion before and it was decided that the warning was
not needed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81745
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
See the thread starting at
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-04/msg00457.html .
16 matches
Mail list logo
