https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88974
--- Comment #7 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #6)
> And this updated patch, while it bootstrapped, had quite a few testsuite
> regressions. So, I'm afraid I don't know where would in some cases the
> src_loc be
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88974
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 48049
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48049=edit
gcc10-pr88974.patch
Unfortunately, that patch failed bootstrap miserably (e.g. the compiler
generated
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88974
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 48042
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48042=edit
gcc10-pr88974.patch
Untested fix for that. Or instead set result->src_loc to result->src_loc =
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88974
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88974
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88974
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Sat Jan 26 10:08:00 2019
New Revision: 268285
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268285=gcc=rev
Log:
PR preprocessor/88974
* directives.c (SEEN_EOL): Move macro to ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88974
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88974
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.0
