https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107167
--- Comment #6 from cqwrteur ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #5)
> You already filed this one.
>
> *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 103550 ***
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> This is a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107167
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107167
--- Comment #4 from cqwrteur ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> Plus your example might be slower due to dependencies.
Dependency is only an issue to a certain degree. 1st one it has things like
"movl%edi, %edx; rorl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107167
--- Comment #3 from cqwrteur ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> This is a reassociation, scheduling issue and register allocation issue.
>
> Plus your example might be slower due to dependencies.
>
> Without a full example of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107167
--- Comment #2 from cqwrteur ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> This is a reassociation, scheduling issue and register allocation issue.
>
> Plus your example might be slower due to dependencies.
>
> Without a full example of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107167
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
Keywords|
