https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112380
Roger Sayle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112380
--- Comment #13 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Roger Sayle :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:624e274ca3a4405a55662fa72d1163120df0e03d
commit r14-6424-g624e274ca3a4405a55662fa72d1163120df0e03d
Author: Roger Sayle
Date: Mon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112380
--- Comment #12 from Roger Sayle ---
Patch proposed (actually two alternatives proposed) at
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-November/636203.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112380
--- Comment #11 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Roger Sayle from comment #10)
>
> I'm testing a patch.
Did you get anywhere in the end?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112380
Roger Sayle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |roger at
nextmovesoftware dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112380
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||roger at nextmovesoftware dot
com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112380
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-11-04
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112380
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #6)
> bisect says:
>
> commit r14-4612-g6decda1a35be57
> Author: Richard Biener
> Date: Thu Oct 12 11:34:57 2023 +0200
>
> tree-optimization/111779 - Handle some
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112380
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112380
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
```
Trying 25, 31, 32 -> 34:
25: strict_low_part(r114:TI#0)=r102:QI
REG_DEAD r102:QI
31: {r131:SI=r130:SI&0x1f800;clobber flags:CC;}
REG_DEAD r130:SI
REG_UNUSED flags:CC
32:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112380
--- Comment #4 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #3)
> might not be a 14 regression, I need to build older gccs with more checking
ok, it is a 14 regression
11 matches
Mail list logo