https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14319
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ghazi at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14319
--- Comment #18 from James Kuyper Jr.
---
(In reply to Vincent Lefèvre from comment #17)
> (In reply to Tim Rentsch from comment #10)
> > Four: Despite the last observation, the "one special guarantee" clause
> > (and hence also DR 257) is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14319
Vincent Lefèvre changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vincent-gcc at vinc17 dot net
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14319
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14319
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iains at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14319
--- Comment #14 from Tim Rentsch ---
(In reply to James Kuyper from comment #11)
That last message was in reply to James Kuyper in #11. I
was expecting a reference would be added automatically.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14319
Tim Rentsch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||txr at alumni dot caltech.edu
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14319
--- Comment #12 from James Kuyper Jr. ---
(In reply to Wolfgang Bangerth from comment #2)
> I can't believe the wording means what you imply. Assume that caller
> and callee are in different translation units, then there is no
> way for the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14319
James Kuyper Jr. changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jameskuyper at verizon dot net
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14319
--- Comment #10 from Tim Rentsch ---
I would like to add a few comments to the discussion.
One: C and C++ are different in how they treat unions. My comments
here are about C. I believe they apply to C++ as well, but I am not
as familiar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14319
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc
--- Comment #8 from dvilleneuve at kronos dot com 2009-12-19 14:41 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
*** Bug 42432 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Sorry for the duplicate. Seems I did not search enough...
The resolution I've found for DR 257 is that there are no defects
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-19 03:45 ---
*** Bug 42432 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||alias
Last reconfirmed|2005-05-26 12:37:22 |2005-09-26 15:42:20
date|
14 matches
Mail list logo
