--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28
15:46 ---
Since PR 18420 is fixed, I checking this one too.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18294
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28
15:53 ---
Fixed also by the patch which fixed PR18420.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Additional Comments From sje at cup dot hp dot com 2004-11-10 18:54
---
See proposed patch in http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-11/msg00829.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18294
--- Additional Comments From wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-11
05:19 ---
This appears to be the same bug as 18420.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18294
--- Additional Comments From wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-10
01:22 ---
See comments in
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2004-11/msg00316.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18294
--- Additional Comments From sje at cup dot hp dot com 2004-11-05 22:51 ---
I still don't understand the bug but it seems to be related to the code inside
the POINTERS_EXTEND_UNSIGNED ifdef in function.c. If I comment this out
things compile, if I leave it in and put a call to
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
||org
Keywords|
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-04 00:20
---
Confirmed:
t.c: In function 'adjust_field_type':
t.c:14: error: insn outside basic block
(insn 91 82 0 (set (reg/f:DI 381)
(reg/f:DI 328 sfp)) -1 (nil)
(nil))
t.c:14: internal compiler error: in
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-04 00:24
---
This is caused during .jump
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18294
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-04 00:58
---
Hmm, we are putting code after the loop and after function end, I don't know why.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18294
10 matches
Mail list logo
