[Bug rtl-optimization/21002] RTL prologue and basic-block reordering pessimizes delay-slot filling

2005-10-23 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-24 03:15 --- reorg needs to be rewritten to be basic block friendly. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug rtl-optimization/21002] RTL prologue and basic-block reordering pessimizes delay-slot filling

2005-04-16 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-16 16:44 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug rtl-optimization/21002] RTL prologue and basic-block reordering pessimizes delay-slot filling

2005-04-14 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-14 06:27 --- I'm interested too. :-) FWIW, when I did the transition on SPARC, I compared the assembly code generated for all testcases in gcc.c-torture/compile at -O2; IIRC there were a few regressions related to

[Bug rtl-optimization/21002] RTL prologue and basic-block reordering pessimizes delay-slot filling

2005-04-13 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-13 19:21 --- Created an attachment (id=8620) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8620action=view) testcase mentioned in description -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21002

[Bug rtl-optimization/21002] RTL prologue and basic-block reordering pessimizes delay-slot filling

2005-04-13 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot ||org