--- Comment #8 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-07 12:15 ---
Fixed as part of PR42617.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 42617 ***
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2009-09-29 21:18 ---
Not alpha specific, happens on current mainline, where on x86_64 we produce the
code as shown in comment #5.
I think that Richi will be interested in the fact that the usage of __restrict
does not change generated code
--- Comment #5 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2009-02-09 08:28 ---
On alpha, we generate (-O3 -fno-tree-vectorize -funroll-loops):
$L2:
lda $19,4($1)
addq $17,$1,$21
lda $2,8($1)
cpys $f31,$f31,$f31
addq $17,$19,$20
ldl $22,0($21)
--- Comment #4 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-02-08 14:15 ---
This is a really old bug with no changes for a long time. Could someone check
whether there still is an issue here, and if so, confirm the bug?
Uros, I added you because you seem to be interested in Alpha lately...
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-25 20:06 ---
The second testcase works on x86_64 with -O2 -fschedule-insns -funroll-loops
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
