--- Comment #11 from eric dot weddington at atmel dot com 2010-01-29 17:07
---
Setting Target Milestone.
--
eric dot weddington at atmel dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #10 from hutchinsonandy at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-13
21:05 ---
Fixed 4.5
--
hutchinsonandy at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #9 from hutchinsonandy at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-13 21:03
---
Subject: Bug 23726
Author: hutchinsonandy
Date: Sun Dec 13 21:03:41 2009
New Revision: 155195
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=155195
Log:
PR target/23726
* config/avr/predicates.md (ps
--- Comment #8 from bjoern dot m dot haase at web dot de 2007-12-12 18:14
---
Created an attachment (id=14738)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14738&action=view)
patch
My new analysis leads me to the result that the key problem of this missed
optimization is a targe
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-02 17:16 ---
All P1 enhancements not targeted towards 4.1, moving to P5.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfi
--- Additional Comments From bjoern dot m dot haase at web dot de
2005-09-06 12:59 ---
I have done some code reading now and come to the following conclusion:
When having an expanded sequence that provides one single result, libcall
blocks are an appropriate method for making sure th
--- Additional Comments From bjoern dot m dot haase at web dot de
2005-09-06 07:52 ---
Do you know of any doc on how libcall block RTL is supposed to look like
(except from e.g. code reading optabs.c)?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23726
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-05
14:55 ---
You most likely want to use a libcall blocks instead of the regnotes here.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23726
--- Additional Comments From bjoern dot m dot haase at web dot de
2005-09-05 06:59 ---
IMO, one would not be able to handle the issue by changing CSE. E.g. I
presently don't see how to avoid using register notes for the following
situation. Imagine a target not having DImode operations
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-04
22:33 ---
Or even better add support for multiple sets in CSE and forget about adding
notes. That will improve
more targets than just AVR.
--
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Additional Comments From bjoern dot m dot haase at web dot de
2005-09-04 22:02 ---
Created an attachment (id=9665)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9665&action=view)
Patch adding REG_EQUAL notes to the divmod4 expanders
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.
12 matches
Mail list logo
