--- Comment #16 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-16 09:37
---
Subject: Bug 24257
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Jan 16 09:37:10 2006
New Revision: 109744
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=109744
Log:
2006-01-16 Steven Bosscher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment #17 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-16 09:37
---
Fixed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Comment #15 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-14 19:27
---
Fixed on the mainline at least.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #10 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-16 08:52 ---
Re. comment #9
GCSE store motion is very broken, and it's really been like that for a long
time. And it doesn't really do much, either, when you turn it on. Sadly we
have nothing to replace it right now except
--- Comment #9 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-31 06:05
---
How broken is -fgcse-sm? Is it broken enough that it should not only be
disabled by default but also hard-wired off on release branches?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24257
--- Comment #7 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-21 11:13 ---
I do not consider this to be a regression, really.
Store motion was always broken. There are reasons for why it is disabled
by default ;-)
pinskia, what do you think: Keep this marked as a regression, or not?
--
On Oct 21, 2005, at 7:13 AM, steven at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
pinskia, what do you think: Keep this marked as a regression, or not?
I think it should be kept as a regression. Otherwise it will get
overlooked before it is time to turn on store motion.
-- Pinski
--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-21 12:48 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] ICE: in extract_insn with -O -fgcse -fgcse-sm
On Oct 21, 2005, at 7:13 AM, steven at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
pinskia, what do you think: Keep this marked as a regression, or
