--- Comment #8 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-19 10:12 ---
Bootstrapped and regtested on s390-linux-gnu for all default languages. We
already branched, so I leave it to you comitting the patch.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24883
--- Comment #5 from ian at airs dot com 2005-11-18 20:13 ---
Created an attachment (id=10277)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10277action=view)
Patch
This patch appears to fix the problem.
However, I am about to leave for the weekend, and won't be back until Monday.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24883
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-18 20:30 ---
I'll do it.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24883
--- Comment #7 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-19 02:16
---
S390 is not release critical.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from saurabh dot verma at codito dot com 2005-11-17 10:05
---
Adding myself to CC list, as the offending patch was given by me
--
saurabh dot verma at codito dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from uweigand at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-17 12:45
---
It looks like the simplify-rtx patch is not really the cause of the problem,
it simply exposes a pre-existing bug in combine and/or flow.
Before combine, we have a situation that looks like (simplified):
insn
--- Comment #2 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-16 19:31 ---
A regression hunt using an s390-linux cross compiler on powerpc-linux
identified the following patch:
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=103955
r103955 | ian | 2005-09-06 17:51:48 + (Tue, 06 Sep 2005) | 3
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-15 22:03 ---
Created an attachment (id=10245)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10245action=view)
reduced testcase
testcase
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24883
