[Bug rtl-optimization/26945] [3.4/4.0/4.1 regression] Attempt to delete prologue/epilogue insn

2006-03-30 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-30 19:59 --- I am starting to think we should change a[outofbounds] = 1 to be an __builtin_trap() so that we will not run into stuff like this again. Also we should have a keyword for ice-on-undefined-code too :). -- pinskia

[Bug rtl-optimization/26945] [3.4/4.0/4.1 regression] Attempt to delete prologue/epilogue insn

2006-03-30 Thread tausq at debian dot org
--- Comment #2 from tausq at debian dot org 2006-03-30 16:31 --- The code is valid syntactically, but there is actually a bug. the longoptions array only has 3 elements, but we try to fill in 4 entries. if we make the longoptions array bigger than it doesn't cause the ICE. -- http:/

[Bug rtl-optimization/26945] [3.4/4.0/4.1 regression] Attempt to delete prologue/epilogue insn

2006-03-30 Thread tausq at debian dot org
--- Comment #1 from tausq at debian dot org 2006-03-30 16:28 --- Created an attachment (id=11167) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11167&action=view) testcase -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26945