--- Comment #17 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-12 08:10
---
(In reply to comment #16)
(In reply to comment #15)
The patch fails bootstrap in stage2 for ppc (only).
This bootstraps just fine for me on the mainline with powerpc-darwin.
And there were no regressions.
--
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29797
--- Comment #18 from sayle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-13 00:42 ---
Subject: Bug 29797
Author: sayle
Date: Mon Nov 13 00:41:53 2006
New Revision: 118740
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=118740
Log:
2006-11-12 Michael Matz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Roger
--- Comment #14 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-11 12:16
---
I have started a bootstrap regtest on
{i386,ia64,ppc,ppc64,s390,s390x,x86_64}-linux on the 4.1 branch.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29797
--- Comment #15 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-11 14:30
---
The patch fails bootstrap in stage2 for ppc (only).
stage2/xgcc -Bstage2/ -B/usr/powerpc64-suse-linux/bin/ -c -O2
-fmessage-length=0 -Wall -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -g -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -DIN_GCC
-W -Wall
--- Comment #16 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-11 20:11
---
(In reply to comment #15)
The patch fails bootstrap in stage2 for ppc (only).
This bootstraps just fine for me on the mainline with powerpc-darwin.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29797
--- Comment #12 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-10 17:31
---
PR 9814.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
--- Comment #13 from roger at eyesopen dot com 2006-11-10 19:41 ---
Grr. Yep, Michael's BITS_BIG_ENDIAN test looks to be the correct thing. The
effect of BITS_BIG_ENDIAN on sign_extract and zero_extract is documented in
rtl.texi. Is anyone bootstrapping and regression testing this
