http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38644
--- Comment #59 from jye2 at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-04 16:50:11 UTC ---
Author: jye2
Date: Fri Nov 4 16:50:04 2011
New Revision: 180964
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=180964
Log:
2011-11-04 Jiangning Liu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38644
--- Comment #56 from Jiangning Liu jiangning.liu at arm dot com 2011-10-31
07:48:25 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #54)
I tested with GCC 4.6.2 and the patch provided by Mikael Pettersson. It works
for -march=armv4t and -march=armv5t, but not
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38644
--- Comment #57 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2011-10-31
08:32:09 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #56)
(In reply to comment #54)
I tested with GCC 4.6.2 and the patch provided by Mikael Pettersson. It
works
for -march=armv4t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38644
--- Comment #58 from Sebastian Huber sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de
2011-10-31 10:45:43 UTC ---
I tested Jiangning Liu's latest patch. With it GCC 4.6.2 produces valid code
for -march=armv4t, -march=armv5t, -march=armv5te, -march=armv6, and
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38644
--- Comment #55 from Dave Murphy davem at devkitpro dot org 2011-10-29
23:27:02 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #54)
I tested with GCC 4.6.2 and the patch provided by Mikael Pettersson. It works
for -march=armv4t and -march=armv5t, but not for
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38644
--- Comment #54 from Sebastian Huber sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de
2011-10-28 07:31:19 UTC ---
I tested with GCC 4.6.2 and the patch provided by Mikael Pettersson. It works
for -march=armv4t and -march=armv5t, but not for -march=armv5te:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38644
--- Comment #53 from Sebastian Huber sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de
2011-10-24 13:06:03 UTC ---
I tested the above patch proposed by Mikael Pettersson (from 2010-05-26, more
than one year ago) with GCC 4.6 20111021. It still fixes the test
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38644
--- Comment #52 from Sebastian Huber sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de
2011-10-15 08:48:10 UTC ---
In GCC 4.6.2 20111014 (prerelease) the problem is still not fixed and
arm-eabi-gcc -march=armv5t -mthumb -O2 produces wrong code. Please don't
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38644
--- Comment #51 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de
2011-09-26 08:04:37 UTC ---
On Mon, 12 Sep 2011, rearnsha at arm dot com wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38644
--- Comment #48 from Richard Earnshaw
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38644
--- Comment #46 from Sebastian Huber sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de
2011-09-12 08:42:59 UTC ---
I guess the local patch will look like this:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2011-07/msg00459.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38644
--- Comment #47 from Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com 2011-09-12 15:18:44
UTC ---
On 09/12/2011 02:42 AM, sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38644
--- Comment #46 from Sebastian
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38644
--- Comment #48 from Richard Earnshaw rearnsha at arm dot com 2011-09-12
15:31:51 UTC ---
On 12/09/11 16:18, law at redhat dot com wrote:
A much simpler way to fix this is to emit a barrier just prior to
mucking around with stack pointer in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38644
--- Comment #49 from Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com 2011-09-12 15:33:56
UTC ---
On 09/12/2011 09:31 AM, rearnsha at arm dot com wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38644
--- Comment #48 from Richard Earnshawrearnsha at arm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38644
--- Comment #50 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-12
18:24:58 UTC ---
Perhaps someone can comment on, and test, Joern's patch here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2011-07/msg00461.html
@Richard E: That would be a middle-end fix,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38644
Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||steven at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38644
--- Comment #44 from Joel Sherrill joel at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-09
13:27:54 UTC ---
Ping.. any chance of getting the proposed 4.6 fix merged? Please.
This is almost a 3 year old bug. It would be nice to get it closed.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38644
--- Comment #43 from Sebastian Huber sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de
2011-09-06 07:45:29 UTC ---
How long will this middle to back end ping pong last until this bug is finally
fixed? It is now open since 2008.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38644
--- Comment #42 from LYZ lingyouz...@arimacomm-hz.cn 2011-08-15 08:08:46 UTC
---
*** Bug 50081 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38644
--- Comment #41 from Jiangning Liu jiangning.liu at arm dot com 2011-08-09
02:04:52 UTC ---
Yes, this is from the libstdc++ sources (4.6.1 20110627,
libstdc++-v3/libsupc++/new_opnt.cc). You need a non-EABI ARM variant of GCC
since this bug
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38644
--- Comment #40 from Sebastian Huber sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de
2011-08-05 06:49:00 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #39)
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 2:33 AM, jiangning.liu at arm dot com
[...]
Is it possible you send me your source code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38644
--- Comment #37 from Sebastian Huber sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de
2011-08-04 12:30:29 UTC ---
Is this problem also related to this bug (GCC 4.6.1 20110627) with comments
inside:
objdump -d -C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38644
--- Comment #39 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana.r at gmail dot com
2011-08-05 03:57:14 UTC ---
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 2:33 AM, jiangning.liu at arm dot com
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38644
---
22 matches
Mail list logo
