--- Comment #7 from abel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-24 09:01 ---
Subject: Bug 42388
Author: abel
Date: Tue Aug 24 09:01:18 2010
New Revision: 163507
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=163507
Log:
Backport from mainline:
PR rtl-optimization/42388
--- Comment #6 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-07 04:44 ---
Subject: Bug 42388
Author: hjl
Date: Sun Feb 7 04:41:22 2010
New Revision: 156562
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=156562
Log:
Backport testcases from mainline to 4.4.
2010-02-06 H.J. Lu
--- Comment #5 from abel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-14 11:08 ---
Fixed.
--
abel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #4 from abel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-14 11:02 ---
Subject: Bug 42388
Author: abel
Date: Thu Jan 14 11:02:18 2010
New Revision: 155894
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=155894
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/42388
* sel-sched-ir.c (maybe_t
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42388
--- Comment #3 from abel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-24 07:39 ---
The problem was that the failing assert is actually too strict, when an empty
block is removed, its predecessor could be outside the region. After fixing
this, I have also further robustified the function to expect emp
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.4.2
Summary|ICE in move_bb_info with|[4.5 Regression