--- Comment #6 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-18 08:27 ---
Reopening...
--
steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-18 08:29 ---
...to close as dup of bug 39871
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 39871 ***
--
steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from carrot at google dot com 2010-03-18 03:52 ---
In this case arm_arm_address_cost does the right thing. The problem is in
function should_replace_address.
When two addresses have same address cost, we choose the one with higher rtx
cost. The reason is That has the
--- Comment #3 from ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-10 14:49 ---
Confirmed but do we expect this to be done in CSE . IIUC, shouldn't this be a
part of fwprop handling addresses rather than doing this in CSE ?
--
ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What
--- Comment #4 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-10 16:21 ---
Another arm_arm_address_cost problem, dup of something I'm not even going to
try to find.
Until ARM or an ARM maintainer cares (or Google folks stop filing and start
fixing bugs), we don't need more reports of the
--- Comment #1 from carrot at google dot com 2010-03-08 08:28 ---
Created an attachment (id=20040)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20040action=view)
test case
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43286
--- Comment #2 from carrot at google dot com 2010-03-08 08:32 ---
The command line options are: -march=armv7-a -O2 -fpic
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43286
