[Bug rtl-optimization/43632] [4.5 Regression] -g option became very slow after r157834

2010-04-06 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-06 11:21 --- GCC 4.5.0 is being released. Deferring to 4.5.1. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug rtl-optimization/43632] [4.5 Regression] -g option became very slow after r157834

2010-04-06 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-06 10:07 --- callgrind --inclusive=yes says on this: 438,822,838,411 /usr/src/gcc/obj/gcc/../../gcc/var-tracking.c:variable_tracking_main 429,638,024,208 /usr/src/gcc/obj/libiberty/../../libiberty/hashtab.c:htab_traverse_nore

[Bug rtl-optimization/43632] [4.5 Regression] -g option became very slow after r157834

2010-04-03 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43632

[Bug rtl-optimization/43632] [4.5 Regression] -g option became very slow after r157834

2010-04-02 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-02 21:03 --- Another datapoint: I now get WARNING: program timed out. FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/limits-fnargs.c -O3 -g (test for excess errors) consistently on a somewhat old machine. It hadn't showed up for months (yea

[Bug rtl-optimization/43632] [4.5 Regression] -g option became very slow after r157834

2010-04-02 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-02 20:26 --- Confirmed. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCON