http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46387
--- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-09
11:01:31 UTC ---
Created attachment 22341
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22341
required stack-protector support patch
Required patch.
Reducing.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46387
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46387
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46387
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-09
15:20:47 UTC ---
The interesting insns here are:
(insn:TI 70 272 60 5 (set (reg:BI 262 p6 [394])
(ge:BI (reg:SI 16 r16 [orig:347 prephitmp.13 ] [347])
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46387
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-09
17:48:04 UTC ---
The problem is when processing
(insn:TI 75 270 251 5 (cond_exec (eq (reg:BI 262 p6 [394])
(const_int 0 [0]))
(set (mem/c/i:SI (reg/f:DI 32
