https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47582
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
--- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu ---
Fixed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47582
Tony changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Last reconfirmed|2017-07-22 00:00:00
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47582
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47582
Tony Poppleton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2017-7-22
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47582
Bug 47582 depends on bug 23684, which changed state.
Bug 23684 Summary: Combine stores for non strict alignment targets
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23684
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47582
--- Comment #2 from Tony Poppleton tony.poppleton at gmail dot com ---
Re-testing this with GCC 5.1, the code appears to be even less efficient, for
both cases;
DM1:
.LFB0:
.cfi_startproc
movss b(%rip), %xmm0
xorl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47582
--- Comment #3 from Tony Poppleton tony.poppleton at gmail dot com ---
Ignore the last comment - hadn't spotted the int return value on main...
So the code is actually more correct than previous versions, and no change to
the status of this bug.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47582
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||23684
---
