[Bug rtl-optimization/49148] Certain expressions take an extremely long time for no apparent reason

2021-12-26 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49148 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug rtl-optimization/49148] Certain expressions take an extremely long time for no apparent reason

2011-05-25 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49148 --- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-25 09:26:56 UTC --- Try -ffast-math (the default for ICC) which disables subnormals.

[Bug rtl-optimization/49148] Certain expressions take an extremely long time for no apparent reason

2011-05-25 Thread jchthys at yahoo dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49148 --- Comment #7 from John Peyton jchthys at yahoo dot com 2011-05-25 14:40:56 UTC --- Try -ffast-math (the default for ICC) which disables subnormals. Thanks, this helped it run much faster! I noticed it still takes longer to divide by 3.0 than

[Bug rtl-optimization/49148] Certain expressions take an extremely long time for no apparent reason

2011-05-24 Thread jchthys at yahoo dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49148 John Peyton jchthys at yahoo dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |minor

[Bug rtl-optimization/49148] Certain expressions take an extremely long time for no apparent reason

2011-05-24 Thread jchthys at yahoo dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49148 --- Comment #5 from John Peyton jchthys at yahoo dot com 2011-05-24 21:26:49 UTC --- Maybe you are getting subnormals which causes a huge performance decrease. It looks like that might indeed be the case. It didn't seem to happen with ICC